Division Member Evaluation - SP02 by Charles Risher, Humanities Division Chair I. Teaching effectiveness A. Please assess the division member's effectiveness in the following areas: 1. Syllabus preparation 0 1 2 3 4 5 2. Testing and evaluation methods 0 1 2 3 4 5 3. Grading methods 0 1 2 3 4 5 4. Advising 0 1 2 3 4 5 Comments: Very effective. B. Please describe the division member's teaching effectiveness, noting strengths and weaknesses, based on classroom observation(s). -- Brilliant intermix-mix of lecture, discussion and Power Point. -- No noted weaknesses, per se. II. Effective participation in the work of the division Please describe the division member's contributions to the work of the division, taking into consideration areas such as development or revision of courses and degree programs, use of division resources, participation in division meetings, implementation of new ideas to improve the effectiveness of the curriculum, and efforts to promote the role of the division on campus and in the community. -- Brian remains pro-active:  willing to do anything when called upon (e.g. devotion, web site update for Div. & for individuals. -- A contributor... III. Professional development A. Please comment on the division member's professional growth efforts, noting accomplishments and recommending areas for further development. -- Stays on top of his area. -- Very active use of purchasing funds to sustain Com Arts department needs -- Conferences --  B. Please assess the division member's professional development in the following areas: 1. Development of appropriate professional goals 0 1 2 3 4 5 2. Participation in professional growth activities 0 1 2 3 4 5 3. Efforts to keep up with developments in the teaching field 0 1 2 3 4 5 4. Appropriate use of professional growth funds (Brian saved college Professional Growth funds by reallocating Department monies ) 0 1 2 3 4 5 Comments: Brian is excellent at his responsibilities -- self-motivated, model communicator, maintains high expectations for self & students.